621 So. 2d 400 | Ala. Crim. App. | 1993
The appellant, Vincent Edward Hawkins, was convicted of discharging a firearm into an occupied vehicle, a violation of §
The state's evidence tended to show that on July 3, 1989, Jamie Cooper and three other young men traveled from Abbeville to Dothan to go to the Centipede Club, a nightclub. As they were leaving the club about 3:00 a.m., Mazoo Martin approached them in the parking lot and started arguing *401 with one of them. The argument continued after they drove out of the parking lot. Martin approached their vehicle while it was stopped at a nearby red light. Martin told them to pull off the road and Cooper, who was driving, complied. The argument continued and Mazoo called out, "Vince." The appellant then approached, carrying a pistol. As Cooper was attempting to start the automobile and leave, the appellant fired four shots at the automobile. One shot hit a tire and another bullet entered one of the doors. The appellant was arrested later that evening and charged with discharging a firearm into an occupied vehicle.
Section
"No person shall shoot or discharge a firearm, explosive or other weapon which discharges a dangerous projectile into any occupied or unoccupied dwelling or building or railroad locomotive or railroad car, aircraft, automobile, truck or watercraft in this state."
An "automobile" is defined as follows:
The Random House Dictionary of the English Language (2d ed. 1987)."A passenger vehicle designed for operation on ordinary roads and typically having four wheels and a gasoline or diesel internal-combustion engine."
The definition of an automobile includes the frame of the vehicle and the tires. Had the legislature intended to limit the applicability of the statute to the passenger compartment of an automobile, they would have specifically done so in the statute. Section
The shots fired by the appellant, which hit the door and the tire, come within the purview of §
St. John v. State,"The test for determining the admissibility of a photograph is whether it is a true and accurate representation of the subject which it purports to represent, as it existed at the time pertinent to the inquiry."
Cooper identified six photographs of the vehicle taken after the shooting. He stated that the bullet holes shown in the photograph in the frame of the car and the tire were not there when he left the parking lot of the Centipede Club. He stated that the photographs accurately depicted the car as it looked at 8:00 a.m. the morning of the shooting. There are no allegations that the car had been tampered with between 3:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. The photographs of the automobile were correctly received into evidence.
For the foregoing reasons, the judgment in this cause is due to be affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
All the Judges concur.