History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hawkins v. State
131 So. 919
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1931
|
Check Treatment

The constitutionality of the statute under which this prosecution is brought has been upheld by this court. Hayes v. State, 23 Ala. App. 524, 128 So. 774.

Other questions raised, even if technical error, are not of sufficient moment to warrant a reversal. The issue was clear, and the defendant was permitted to make his defense and to introduce all testimony bearing on the issue offered by him. The issue was for the jury, and we find no prejudicial errors in any rulings of the court.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed. *Page 646

Case Details

Case Name: Hawkins v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 13, 1931
Citation: 131 So. 919
Docket Number: 6 Div. 848.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.