History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hawkins v. Sinclair
24 N.D. 623
N.D.
1913
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The points of law raised in this case are substantially those which are raised in the case of Seckerson v. Sinclair, post, 625, 140 N. W. 239, and the case of Burger v. Sinclair, post, 624, 140 N. W. 246, and the facts are the same with the exception of those which relate to the damages sustained. The three actions, in fact, were consolidated upon the trial, and substantially the same rulings were made in each. The same error in regard to the allowance of damages was made in this case as in the others.

The plaintiff, therefore, at his option, may apply to the district court, within thirty days from the handing down of the remittitur herein, and have the judgment modified by entering a judgment for the sum of $365.81, with costs and disbursements, and interest there*624on from the date of the verdict, but from the date of the verdict alone. Otherwise, a new trial will be granted. Each party will pay his own costs and disbursements upon this appeal.

Case Details

Case Name: Hawkins v. Sinclair
Court Name: North Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 10, 1913
Citation: 24 N.D. 623
Court Abbreviation: N.D.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.