SARA HAWES, et al. v. MACY‘S INC., et al.
Case No. 1:17-cv-754 (Lead Case) (Consolidated with 2:20-cv-81)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
April 15, 2024
JUDGE DOUGLAS R. COLE
PAGEID #: 4768
ORDER
Before the Court is the plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Final Approval of the Amended Settlement (Doc. 170), asking the Court to approve the parties’ amended class-action settlement agreement. The Court rejected the original class-action settlement agreement in Hawes v. Macy‘s, Inc., No. 1:17-cv-754, 2023 WL 8811499 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 20, 2023), holding that the settlement agreement, by way of a cy pres provision, inappropriately “divert[ed] class funds to an unrelated third party, whose use of the funds will not benefit the class‘s interests here, directly or indirectly.” Id. at *18.
The Court noted, however, that the settlement agreement was “fair, reasonable, and adequate” under
In other words, the class‘s common fund will go entirely to the class. No portion of the common fund will go to a cy pres recipient. The Court finds that this settlement agreement is “fair, reasonable, and adequate” under
SO ORDERED.
April 15, 2024
DATE
DOUGLAS R. COLE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
