131 Iowa 691 | Iowa | 1906
The plaintiff prayed for judgment on account of overdrafts in the sum of $607. The petition was aided by writ of attachment, and G. J. Shoemaker served thereunder as garnishee. From his answer, taken in open court, it appeared that the defendant Hessler, had conveyed a part of his property by bill of sale to Shoemaker and the remainder to the Hawarden Oreamery Association, with the understanding that the garnishee should reduce the property to money, and distribute it pro rata to the farmer patrons of the creamery, to whom Hessler was indebted. Shoemaker had received under this arrangement $900, and the plaintiff moved for an order that the garnishee pay into the hands of the clerk of court a sufficient sum of money to sat
■As no claim was made that the garnishee would not safely keep the funds until judgment might be recovered against defendant, there was no occasion for turning them over to the clerk prior to the recovery of judgment, even if this might be done in a proper case. His liability as garnishee was still subject to determination after the entry of judgment, and, for this reason, the ruling of the court was not such as to involve the merits of the claim against th¿ garnishee, nor materially to affect the decision finally to be rendered. An appeal cannot be prosecuted from such an order. Section 4101, Code. See Richards v. Burden, 31 Iowa, 305; Walker v. Pumphrey, 82 Iowa, 487. And no other course is open save to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.— Dismissed.
