12 Haw. 64 | Haw. | 1898
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
The defendant in error who was plaintiff below recovered a verdict against the plaintiff in error, defendant below, for $500, two jurors dissenting. The error assigned is in substance that the verdict, upon which judgment was entered, was contrary to
Defendant in error moved to dismiss the writ for want of a sufficient bond as required by Civ. L., Sec. 1450. Plaintiff in -error relied on a bond filed under Civ. L. Secs. 1458-1460, contending that these Sections superseded Sec. 1450. It is unneces.sary to express an opinion upon this point, in view of our opinion upon the other point involved.
The vei’dict must stand.