Havens v. Havens
215 A.D. 756
N.Y. App. Div.
1925
Check Treatment

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crouch and Taylor, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the facts, upon the ground that Mary J. Brady did not intend to transfer to Carrie B. Havens any interest in the account which should be operative during her lifetime; she intended to exercise sole dominion over the fund so long as she lived; that her intent was merely testamentary. Present — ■ Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Sears, Crouch and Taylor, JJ.