History
  • No items yet
midpage
Haugen v. Johnson
115 Tex. 489
Tex.
1926
Check Treatment

BY SUPREME COURT.

Per Curiam :

The judgment of the trial court was correctly affirmed regardless of whether the testimony of C. A. Johnson was prohibited by Article 8690 of the Revised Statutes. The application for writ of error will therefore be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Case Details

Case Name: Haugen v. Johnson
Court Name: Texas Supreme Court
Date Published: May 12, 1926
Citation: 115 Tex. 489
Docket Number: Application No. 14668
Court Abbreviation: Tex.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.