History
  • No items yet
midpage
Haugen v. Johnson
1926 Tex. LEXIS 160
| Tex. | 1926
|
Check Treatment

BY SUPREME COURT.
The judgment of the trial court was correctly affirmed regardless of whether the testimony of C.A. Johnson was prohibited by Article 3690 of the Revised Statutes. The application for writ of error will therefore be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. *Page 490

Case Details

Case Name: Haugen v. Johnson
Court Name: Texas Supreme Court
Date Published: May 12, 1926
Citation: 1926 Tex. LEXIS 160
Docket Number: Application No. 14668.
Court Abbreviation: Tex.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.