Haugabook v. State

453 So. 2d 549 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1984

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. The State failed to establish that appellant wilfully failed to seek her probation officer’s consent before leaving her approved residence, see Kotowski v. State, 344 So.2d 602 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) or that her financial condition was such that payment could be made, Winfield v. State, 406 So.2d 50 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur. LETTS, J., dissents without opinion.