History
  • No items yet
midpage
Haugabook v. State
453 So. 2d 549
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1984
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Reversed. The State failed to establish that appellant wilfully failed to seek her probation officer’s consent before leaving her approved residence, see Kotowski v. State, 344 So.2d 602 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) or that her financial condition was such that payment could be made, Winfield v. State, 406 So.2d 50 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur. LETTS, J., dissents without opinion.

Case Details

Case Name: Haugabook v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Aug 8, 1984
Citation: 453 So. 2d 549
Docket Number: No. 83-2204
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.