History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hatch v. Morosco Holding Co.
26 F.2d 247
2d Cir.
1928
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

A majority of the court, as it is now constituted, think that our first decision impairs the jurisdiction of the District Court over assets already in its custody when the judgment of the state court was entered. They believe that the liquidation of claims is a part of the distribution of the estate, since it determines how much each creditor shall get, and that the distribution of the estate is part of what is usually understood as jurisdiction over the res. However, the former decision was reached after unusual deliberation and full presentation of all the questions involved. If it is to be changed, only the Supreme Court may do so; in the same ease and on the same claim the first ruling must stand.

Order affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hatch v. Morosco Holding Co.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date Published: May 7, 1928
Citation: 26 F.2d 247
Docket Number: No. 284
Court Abbreviation: 2d Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.