History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hatch v. Hart
2 Mich. 289
Mich.
1851
Check Treatment
By the Court, Pratt, J.

The value of the services of an attorney and counsel for the plaintiff in replevin, or any fees actually paid by the plaintiff to his attorney and counsel in the prosecution of a replevin suit, constitutes no part of the damages contemplated by the statute, and cannot be legally taken into consideration in the assessment of such damages.

Case Details

Case Name: Hatch v. Hart
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1851
Citation: 2 Mich. 289
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.