History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hastings v. H.M. Byllesby and Company, Rosen
286 N.Y. 705
| NY | 1941
|
Check Treatment

Motion to amend remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. The only question presented upon this appeal was the correctness of the order granting the motion to dismiss under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. (See 286 N.Y. 468.)

Case Details

Case Name: Hastings v. H.M. Byllesby and Company, Rosen
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 16, 1941
Citation: 286 N.Y. 705
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.