History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hassfurter v. Garrison
210 A.D. 802
N.Y. App. Div.
1924
Check Treatment

Award reversed and claim remitted to the State Industrial Board, with costs to the appellant against said Board to abide the event. Since there is not a loss of two or more fingers or of two or more phalanges of two or more fingers compensation may not be proportioned to the loss of use of the hand. (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 15, subd. 3, q.) * Compensation should be awarded under section 15, subdivisions 3, i, j, 1 and s,* for the total loss of the second finger and for the proportionate loss of use of the third and fourth fingers, of each of which claimant has suffered a permanent partial loss of use. All concur.

See Workmen’s Compensation Law of 1922, g 15, subd. 3, 1HÍ i, j.- 1, 9, s, respectively.— [Rep.

Case Details

Case Name: Hassfurter v. Garrison
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 15, 1924
Citation: 210 A.D. 802
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.