Hass v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityHass v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority
—Amended judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Stecher, J.), entered December 8, 1992, after a jury trial, which, inter alia, awarded judgment in favor of plaintiff, in the amount of $1,100,000 plus interest, is unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The jury reasonably determined that plaintiff should recover for her emotional injuries as a result of being within the "zone of danger” when she witnessed her daughter’s fatal accident (see, Bovsun v Sanperi,
The trial court’s charge to the jury regarding the "zone of danger” doctrine was proper. The fact that the court also inferentially mentioned the doctrine that "danger invites rescue” did not affect the propriety of the "zone of danger” concept, nor did it create, as defendant maintains, a "new cause of action for tort recovery.” Notably, the two doctrines are not mutually inconsistent and can be contemporaneously applicable in situations, such as this one, where an immediate relative attempts to rescue a loved one and is thereby placed in the "zone of danger” (see, e.g., DiMarco v Supermarkets Gen. Corp.,