History
  • No items yet
midpage
Haskell v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.
19 F.R.D. 356
E.D. Pa.
1956
Check Treatment
WELSH, District Judge.

On February 10, 1955, this Court entered an order directing plaintiff to produce certain documents dealing with the deceased’s earnings for the years 1951, 1952 and 1953. Plaintiff failed to com*357ply with said order. As a result defendant filed the instant motion to dismiss under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 37(b) (2) (iii), 28 U.S.C.A.

In opposing the motion plaintiff states that she has searched diligently for the documents but has been unable to locate them. She further states that she will produce the documents immediately should they be located.

We do not think that under such circumstances a dismissal of the action is required. As Rule 37(b) (2) (iii) gives us the discretion to grant to the defendant other relief, we direct that an order be entered requiring plaintiff to file an affidavit stating that the documents in question are not available and that she will produce them immédiately should they be located.

Case Details

Case Name: Haskell v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.
Court Name: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jun 13, 1956
Citation: 19 F.R.D. 356
Docket Number: No. 18117
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.