Harvey v. WoodsHarvey v. Woods
Petitioner, a prison inmate, attempted to lessen the effects of a chemical agent that was being used by correction officers on another inmate by throwing water into that inmate‘s face. Petitioner also encouraged the other inmate to continue resisting the officers and to defy their orders. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with creating a disturbance, demonstration and interference with an employee. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges. An unsuccessful administrative appeal prompted petitioner to commence this
We confirm. The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence consisting of the misbehavior report and corroborating hearing testimony from the correction officer who authored it (see Matter of Rodriguez v Selsky, 47 AD3d 1173, 1173 [2008]). Contradictory testimony from the other inmate involved in the incident created credibility issues for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Morillo v Goord, 38 AD3d 947, 947-948 [2007]).
Cardona, P.J., Peters, Carpinello, Lahtinen and Malone Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.