Harvey v. GoordHarvey v. Goord
At the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of unauthorized organizational activity and a facility correspondence violation. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal and this
We confirm. The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence consisting of the misbehavior report and testimony adduced at the hearing, including admissions made by petitioner that he mailed the offending letter containing organizational recruitment instructions to a third person not addressed on the outside of the envelope (see Matter of Lopez v Healy, 39 AD3d 978, 978 [2007]; Matter of Rizzuto v Goord, 35 AD3d 1075, 1075 [2006]). As for petitioner’s claim that the or
Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.