Hartzog v. Eubanks

202 So. 2d 656 | La. | 1967

The application is denied. According to the facts of the case, as found to be by the Court of Appeal, the result reached by the court is correct.

HAMITER, J.,

is of the opinion that the writ should be issued to allow consideration of the application of the doctrine of last chance.

SANDERS, J.,

is of the opinion that a writ should be granted. He expresses no opinion at this time as to the result to be reached.