History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hartshorne v. Johnson
7 N.J.L. 108
N.J.
1823
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We are of opinion that there must be a new trial. -'The defendants had a right to retain in their hands sufficient to pay -themselves for the transportation of the one hundred and thirty-four barrels, but for no inore. The possession, as to this, was never given up, or the lien destroyed. As to the validity of the judgment in attachment, we think we cannot look into it in this collateral way. We do not, however, consider this as coming in question here.

New trial granted.

Case Details

Case Name: Hartshorne v. Johnson
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Sep 15, 1823
Citation: 7 N.J.L. 108
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.