History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hartshorne v. Boorum
52 N.J. Eq. 587
N.J.
1894
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Order affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — Abbett, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Reed, Van Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Smith — 10.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Hartshorne v. Boorum
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jun 15, 1894
Citation: 52 N.J. Eq. 587
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.