History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hartridge v. Mayer
149 A.D. 915
N.Y. App. Div.
1912
Check Treatment

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. (Ingraham, P. J., dissented, on the ground that the verdict was exorbitant and excessive.)

Case Details

Case Name: Hartridge v. Mayer
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 15, 1912
Citation: 149 A.D. 915
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.