195 P. 1117 | Or. | 1921
It does not appear from the record as to whether the allegations and interrogatories were filed before or after judgment was rendered against Lambert. As
In this condition of the record and without further proceedings in the Circuit Court against the garnishee in the Lambert case, the plaintiff “In the Matter of the Estate of T. M. Stark, Deceased,” filed a petition against the defendant as executrix, in the Circuit Court
Here again .it will be noted that no legal tender of the money is made. In the absence of refusal or waiver, it is not sufficient to allege that a person is ready and willing to pay. To make a valid tender, the party must be ready and willing and offer to pay. In “Words and Phrases,” volume 6, page 6910, it is said:
“Tender has a definite, legal signification. It imports, not merely the readiness and an ability to pay the money or to deliver over the deed or property at the time and place mentioned in the contract, but also the actual production of the thing to be paid or delivered over, and an offer of it to whom the tender is to be made.
“It is not enough that the party has the money in his pocket, and says to the creditor that he has it ready for him and asks him to take it, without showing the money.
“To constitute a valid, legal tender, there must be an actual offer of the sum due, unless the actual production of the money be dispensed with by a refusal to accept, or something equivalent thereto.”
In Smith v. Foster, 5 Or., page 44, it is held that—
“The mere readiness and willingness of a debtor to pay a demand when due, amounts to nothing without an offer or tender of payment by him, and a refusal by the creditor.”
In the instant case, no refusal or waiver is shown or alleged and no legal tender was ever made, and without
The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.