Hartline v. StateHartline v. State
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Bloodworth
Bloodworth, J.
B. T. Brock, J. M. Lang, for plaintiff in error.
O. 0. Pittman, solicitor-general, contra.
The indictment charged the defendant with manufacturing intoxicating liquor. The jury returned a verdict of attempting to manufacture such liquor. The evidence is not sufficient to support the verdict rendered, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Broyles, G. J., and Luhe, J., concur.