History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hartley v. Ringer
181 A.D. 917
N.Y. App. Div.
1917
Check Treatment

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellaht to abide event. Held, that the trial court erred in instructing the jury *918that if the contract was a blank as to compensation for the services of the plaintiff, the plaintiff was entitled as matter of law to recover the reasonable value of her services. All concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Hartley v. Ringer
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 15, 1917
Citation: 181 A.D. 917
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.