History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hartley v. Brookes
1841 Pa. LEXIS 19
Pa.
1841
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

There is nothing to distinguish this case from others in which such entries as these have been received. Entries transferred from a card to the book on the following day, were admitted in Patton v. Ryan; and the like, in substance, was done in Ingraham v. Bockius. In Kessler v. M‘Conachy, no more was ruled than that the transfer was too late at the expiration of nearly two weeks. The objection that it was made in this instance by a third person, has no greater force. The entries might have been made originally by a clerk; and whether by the verbal instructions or written memo*191randa of the principal, can surely make no difference—they would .be as much the entries of the principal in the one case as in the other.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hartley v. Brookes
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Feb 1, 1841
Citation: 1841 Pa. LEXIS 19
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.