midpage

Hartford Insurance v. GamielHartford Insurance v. Gamiel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Nov 9, 2006
Versions:34 A.D.3d 244
824 N.Y.S.2d 237

■ In the Matter of THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST, Respondent, v RUCHAMA GAMIEL, Appellant. [824 NYS2d 237]—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered August 5, 2005, which granted the petition to permanently stay arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent’s notice of her claim for supplementary uninsured/underinsured motorists (SUM) benefits under the SUM coverage she purchased (see Insurance Law § 3420 [f] [2]), provided to petitioner insurer at least 16 months after respondent’s receipt of notice that the tortfeasor’s insurer was insolvent and in liquidation was not provided “as soon as practicable,” as required by the policy, and was untimely as a matter of law (see Great Canal Realty Corp. v Seneca Ins. Co., Inc., 5 NY3d 742, 743 [2005]; Rekemeyer v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 4 NY3d 468, 474 [2005]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Saxe and McGuire, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Hartford Insurance v. Gamiel
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 9, 2006
Citations: 34 A.D.3d 244; 824 N.Y.S.2d 237
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In