History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hart v. Kaplan
101 N.Y.S. 763
N.Y. App. Term.
1906
Check Treatment
Per Curiara.

Appeal from order granting motion for re-argument dismissed, with ten dollars, costs, the order not being appealable.

The order granting a new trial appealed from was largely discretionary and we do not feel that it should be reversed. Costs should have been imposed, however, as a condition for its being granted.

Order affirmed, upon condition that the plaintiffs, within five days after the entry and service of a copy of this order, pay to the defendant ten dollars costs of the motion (Mnnic. Ot. Act, § 254) and costs of this appeal. 'Otherwise order reversed, with costs and verdict reinstated.

Present: Gildebsleeve, Fitzgebald and Davis, JJ.

Appeal from order granting motion for reargument dismissed.

Order granting new trial affirmed upon condition that plaintiffs, within five days after entry and service of a copy of this order, pay to defendant ten dollars costs of motion and costs of this appeal. Otherwise order reversed, with costs, and verdict reinstated.

Case Details

Case Name: Hart v. Kaplan
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Dec 15, 1906
Citation: 101 N.Y.S. 763
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.