| Or. | Dec 15, 1854
The Code provides that “ the clerk shall prepare separate folded ballots containing the names of the petit
The court incline strongly to the opinion that a party, to take advantage of the irregularity, should object at the time of the departure from the mode prescribed by the law, or otherwise he shall be deemed to have consented to it. But it is not necessary to the determination of this case, to pass upon that question. If an irregulai’ity has been committed in the course of the trial, and it also affirmatively appears that no prejudice resulted to the prisoners from the irregularity, the judgment will not be reversed. In this ease it appears from the bill of exceptions that the prisoners had all of the regular panel in attendance, and that it was necessary to summon talesmen from the bystanders to complete the jury, manifestly, then, the manner of selecting the jury in this case made no difference with the result. The jury would have been the same, if they had been drawn from a box by folded ballots.
Judgment affirmed.