Harry W. Theriault appeals from the District Court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus and other relief. We affirm.
Appellant has contended that officials in the United States Penitentiary in Atlanta have kept him in “close custody” solely on the basis of certain prior convictions in the State of Mississippi, which he alleges were obtained in violation of his constitutional rights.
The District Court held that in the appellant’s case, his “close custody” was based on the large number of fed
*991
eral sentences which he is serving and which are to be served, including at least two which resulted from convictions of escape. The matter is one which addresses itself to internal prison administration.
See
Quick v. Thompkins, 5 Cir., 1970,
Affirmed.
