Harrod v. State, 513 S.W.2d 471

PER CURIAM

The sufficiency of the complaint, verification of the information, and sufficiency of the trial evidence, are not subject to attack in Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., proceedings. The judgment of the Pulaski County Circuit Court denying post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16, V.A.M.R.

All concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Harrod v. State

Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals

Date Published: Aug 19, 1974

Citations: 513 S.W.2d 471; 1974 Mo. App. LEXIS 1680; No. 9667

Docket Number: No. 9667

Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.