History
  • No items yet
midpage
Harrison v. Tate
100 Ga. 317
Ga.
1897
Check Treatment
Atkinson, J.

The discretion of the trial judge in reinstating at the -same term of its dismissal a case which had been -dismissed because of a want of prosecution will not be controlled, unless it h-as been manifestly abused. Under the facts of the present case, the discretion of the co-ur't was not improperly exercised..

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring. 'Harrison & Peeples, for plaintiffs in error. Anderson, Felder & Davis, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Harrison v. Tate
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jan 21, 1897
Citation: 100 Ga. 317
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.