Harrison v. Axtell

Feb 28, 1910

Versions:75 A. 1100

76 N.J. Eq. 614

6 Buchanan 614

1910 N.J. LEXIS 256

Pee Curiam.

We concur in the opinion expressed by the ordinary that the respondent Axtell fairly sustained the burden of showing that the will was not the product of undue influence, but of the full and independent judgment of the testatrix, and, for this reason, affirm the decree under review.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Tbenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voori-iees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Congdon—14.

For reversal—Fone.