Wilwat Properties, Inc. brought a dispossessory action against Marcella Harris. Although Harris filed an answer, she failed to appear at trial, and a default judgment was entered against her. Wilwat was awarded $828.58 in past rent and costs, and a writ of possession was issued. Because Harris asserts issues other than the amount of rent due, OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (3) does not apply to the case sub judice and her direct appeal is proper. Compare
Nixon v. A. F. M., Inc.,
1. In her first enumeration appellant contends the trial court erred by entering the default judgment because she was not timely notified of the trial date. However, the record affirmatively establishes that notice of the trial date was handed to appellant by court personnel when she filed her answer. Accordingly, this enumeration is without merit.
2. Appellant alleges in her second enumeration that the trial court’s failure to rule on her motion for a continuance was error. While appellant insists in her brief that the trial court received her motion prior to trial, a careful review of the record by this court and the trial court clerk’s office fails to indicate that such a motion was ever filed. There is no ruling on this matter which we can properly consider. See generally
Westwind Corp. v. Washington &c. Assoc.,
*162
3. Appellee has filed a motion to assess damages for a frivolous appeal pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-6. As appellant’s arguments are wholly devoid of support from the record, “ ‘we must conclude that the appeal to this court was for the purpose of delay only. . . .’ [Cit.]”
Dickens v. First Capital Income Properties,
Judgment affirmed with direction.