History
  • No items yet
midpage
Harris v. Weiss Engineering Corp.
267 A.D. 96
N.Y. App. Div.
1943
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The facts alleged and the relief demanded in the complaint concern only the corporate structure of the defendant corporation organized under the laws of New Jersey and thus relate exclusively to its internal affairs. (Cohn v. Mishkoff Costello Co., 256 N. Y. 102; Bickart v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co., 243 App. Div. 72.) The court therefore should have declined to assume jurisdiction.

The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the complaint dismissed.

Martin, P. J., Untermyeb, Does, Cohn and Callahan, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the complaint dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Harris v. Weiss Engineering Corp.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 12, 1943
Citation: 267 A.D. 96
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.