22 A.D. 109 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1897
This action was brought to foreclose a mortgage on real property on which there were several prior mortgages. The appellant was a
We think that the court should have granted the motion so far as to direct the receiver to retain the rents. The plaintiff in this action was entitled to the rents only in case there was a deficiency upon the sale of the premises. If the premises realized sufficient to pay the mortgage, then the rents belonged either to the owner of the equity of redemption or to his assignee.
The order appealed from should, therefore, be reversed, and the order appointing the receiver modified by striking out the provision requiring him to pay over the rents to the respondent, without ■costs.
Present— Van Brunt, P. J., Barrett, Rumsey, Williams and Patterson, JJ.
Order reversed, and order appointing receiver modified by striking out the provision requiring him to pay over the rents to the respondent, without costs.