HARRIS v. STUCKI
43068
Court of Appeals of Georgia
September 12, 1967
September 26, 1967
116 Ga. App. 371
Zachary & Hunter, W. E. Zachary, Sr., John C. Hunter, E. H. Stanford, for appellees.
Ross & Finch, Claude R. Ross, I. J. Parkerson, for appellee.
EBERHARDT, Judge. A summary judgment should be granted only when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact for submission to a jury. Holland v. Sanfax Corp., 106 Ga. App. 1 (126 SE2d 442); Dillard v. Brannan, 217 Ga. 179 (121 SE2d 768);
Judgment affirmed in part; reversed in part. Felton, C. J., and Hall, J., concur.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
Defendant, moving for rehearing, urges that since plaintiff alleged in Paragraph 8 of his petition that he was “about to enter the southernmost of the two lanes marked for vehicular traffic traveling west [when] petitioner observed that an automobile traveling west in said lane was about to strike petitioner, and petitioner, in order to avoid being struck by said automobile, stepped backward, and was violently struck down by an automobile being operated by the defendant traveling east in the northernmost of the three marked lanes for traffic trav-
Evidence contrary to these allegations might have been objected to and kept out of the summary judgment hearing, but nothing in this record indicates that any objections were made. Consequently, the contention now made is without merit. Planters Rural Telephone Co-op. v. Chance, 108 Ga. App. 146, 147 (132 SE2d 90).
Motion denied.
