History
  • No items yet
midpage
Harris v. State
50 S.E. 926
Ga.
1905
Check Treatment
Fish,' P. J.

There being no complaint that any error of law was committed upon the trial, and the verdict being amply sustained by the evidence, the court did not err in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Gaudier, J., absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Harris v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: May 10, 1905
Citation: 50 S.E. 926
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.