History
  • No items yet
midpage
Harris v. State
10 S.E.2d 752
Ga.
1940
Check Treatment

The defendant filed to his indictment for a capital felony a plea in abatement, attacking the qualifications and procedure of the grand jurors in the return of the indictment. After rulings striking certain portions of the plea on demurrer by the State, the issues of fact raised by the unstricken parts were tried by a special jury, which returned a verdict "against the plea in abatement." The defendant brought to this court a bill of exceptions assigning error on the refusal of a new trial from this verdict alone, and on exceptions pendente lite to the ruling on the plea. This procedure not presenting a case "of conviction of a capital felony" or any constitutional question such as under art. 6, sec. 2, par. 5, of the constitution (Code, § 2-3005), would give this court jurisdiction, the writ of error with its exceptions relating to the plea in abatement must be transferred to the Court of Appeals. See Humphrey v. State, 175 Ga. 666 (165 S.E. 587), and cit.; Wilburn v. State, 140 Ga. 138, 140 (78 S.E. 819); Ruffin v. State, 151 Ga. 743, 744 (108 S.E. 29); Coleman v. George, 140 Ga. 619 (2), 621 (79 S.E. 543); Bashinski v. State, 123 Ga. 508 (2), 510 (51 S.E. 499); Western Atlantic R. Co. v. Williams, 146 Ga. 27 (90 S.E. 478); McDow v. State, 113 Ga. 699 (39 S.E. 295); Boisclair v. State, 92 Ga. 453 (17 S.E. 270).

Transferred. All the Justices concur.

No. 13461. SEPTEMBER 25, 1940.

Case Details

Case Name: Harris v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Sep 25, 1940
Citation: 10 S.E.2d 752
Docket Number: 13461.
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.