Rеsisting an officer with violence, in violation of section 843.01, Florida Statutes (2006), is a “felony that involves the use or threat of physical force or violence against an individual,” and so is punishable under the prison releasee reoffеnder statute. § 775.082(9)(a)l.o., Fla. Stat. (2006). In affirming on this basis the partial denial of Mr. Harris’ Florida Rulе of Criminal Procedure 3.800 motion, we align ourselves with the Second and Fifth Districts.
See Rawlings v. State,
Like оur sister courts, we begin our analysis with the statute itself, read in light of the supreme cоurt’s opinion in
State v. Hearns,
*751 The statutory language to be construed in the present case defines offenses eligible for prison releasee reoffender sentencing to include any felony involving “the use or threat of physicаl force or violence ... within 3 years after [the felon’s] ... release[] from a state correctional facility.” § 775.082(9)(a)l.o., Fla. Stat. (2006). Appellant stands convicted of “resisting officer with violence to his or her person” during the relevant time period, in violation of section 843.01, which provides:
Whoever knowingly and willfully rеsists ... any officer ... in the lawful execution of any legal duty, by offering or doing violence to the person of such officer ... is guilty of a felony of the third degree....
§ 843.01, Fla. Stat. (2006). Offering to do violence plainly involves the “threat of physical force or violence” while actually doing violence plainly involves the “usе ... of physical force or violence.” § 775.082(9)(a)l.o., Fla. Stat. (2006). Under section 775.082(9)(а)l.o., any felony— or felony attempt — that, like appellant’s, occurs within the relevant time period qualifies as punishable by prison releasee reoffender sentencing if an element of the felony involves even the threat of violence.
In this regard, resisting an officer with violence to his or her pеrson, in violation of section 843.01, differs significantly from simple battery on a law enforcement officer, which the
He
arras court ruled did not qualify as a forcible felony.
*
Our supreme court held that simple “battery on a law enforcement officer” might involve merely a nonviolent, albeit unwanted, touching, and need “not ‘involve the use or threat of use of physical forсe or violence.’ ”
Hearns,
Unlike battery on a law enforcement officer, however, resisting an officer with violence to his or her person in violation of section 843.01, does qualify for prison re-leasee reoffender sentencing. As every other court considering the question has held, “ ‘[s]ince resisting arrest with violence is a felony that involves the use or threat of physical force or violence, thе offense is a qualifying offense under’ the PRR statute.”
Walker,
Affirmed.
Notes
The violent career criminal statute the
Hearns
court construed appliеs to any offense defined as a forcible felony by section 776.08.
See State v. Hearns,
"Forcible felony” means treason; murder; manslaughtеr; sexual battery; carjacking; home-invasion robbery; robbery; burglary; arson; kidnaрping; aggravated assault; aggravated battery; aggravated stalking; aircrаft piracy; unlawful throwing, placing, or discharging of a destructive device or bomb; and any other felony which involves the use or threat of physical force or violence against any individual.
