midpage

Harris v. StateHarris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Mar 22, 2002
5D02-529
Versions:810 So. 2d 1093
2002 WL 440549

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a negotiated plea, Rudolph Harris was convicted of the lesser-included offense of possession of cocaine and received a four year sentence. In his Rule 3.8501 motion, he alleges the existence of several errors in his scoresheet. The trial court in its order acknowledges the existence of scoresheet errors but declined to grant any relief because he entered a plea in exchange for a specific term of years.

The trial court ruled correctly. Scoresheet errors are harmless when the sentence is the result of a negotiated plea agreement. See, e.g., Hill v. State, 730 So.2d 322 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). The transcript reflects that Harris entered his plea in exchange for a four year sentence, not a guidelines sentence. Moreover, as the court points out in its order, he does not seek to withdraw his plea.

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, PLEUS and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur.

Notes

1
Rule 3.850, Fla. R.Crim. Pro. (1999).

Case Details

Case Name: Harris v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 22, 2002
Citations: 810 So. 2d 1093; 2002 WL 440549; 5D02-529
Docket Number: 5D02-529
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In