Harris v. Rogers
190 A.D. 965
N.Y. App. Div.
1920
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

In view of the fact that the complaint was dismissed as to the defendant Rogers and none of the money collected by the plaintiff was contributed by him, we concluded to review the judgment as to him, and reached the conclusion that as to him it should be affirmed. Furthermore, - the defendant Rogers has stipulated to withdraw his motion to dismiss the appeal. Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied.