History
  • No items yet
midpage
Harris v. Reinhard
165 Pa. 36
Pa.
1894
Check Treatment
Pee Cubiam,

We think the learned court below was entirely correct in opening the judgment as to Sarah A. Reinhard and letting her *37into a defence. When the facts are fully developed on the trial the merits of the controversy can be intelligently considered.

Order affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Harris v. Reinhard
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Nov 12, 1894
Citation: 165 Pa. 36
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 237
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.