History
  • No items yet
midpage
Harris v. Mead
16 Abb. Pr. 257
New York Court of Common Pleas
1863
Check Treatment
Daly, F. J.

There were but seven items in this case, under one date. Substantially, there were but two: putting in gas-pipes per contract, $54; plumbing work by contract, $80. The remainder were a few items of extras added to the plumbing work; and, with one exception, a marble top to wash-basin,. *259$10, they were trifling in amount. Within the decisions, this was not a- case for a reference. (Smith a. Brown, 3 How. Pr., 9; Swift a. Wells, 2 Ib., 79; Miller a. Hooker, Ib., 171; Parker a. Snell, 10 Wend., 577; Van Rensselaer a. Jewett, 6 Hill, 373.)

Hilton and Beady, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Harris v. Mead
Court Name: New York Court of Common Pleas
Date Published: Jul 15, 1863
Citation: 16 Abb. Pr. 257
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.