History
  • No items yet
midpage
Harris v. Mayes
94 Ga. App. 505
Ga. Ct. App.
1956
Check Treatment
Qtjillian, J.

1. The filing of an amendment which has no prayer that it be made a part of the petition does not of itself make such amendment a part of the record, but where the amendment was tendered and an order passed directing that it be filed subject to the right of the defendant to demur, the defendant did renew his demurrers, and the judge overruled the demurrers to the petition as amended, the amendment will be treated as having been formally allowed. Newill v. Atlanta Gas-Light Co., 48 Ga. App. 226 (172 S. E. 232).

2. Under the holdings in Mason v. Frankel, 49 Ga. App. 145 (2) (174 S. E. 546), and King Hdw. Co. v. Teplis, 91 Ga. App. 13 (84 S. E. 2d 686), the general demurrer was properly overruled by the judge of the superior court.

3. The special demurrers are without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Felton, C. J., and Nichols, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Harris v. Mayes
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 23, 1956
Citation: 94 Ga. App. 505
Docket Number: 36404
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.