Kenneth Allen Harris was convicted of murder and was sentenced to death. His conviction and sentence were
*245
affirmed on direct appeal.
Harris v. State,
1. His first enumeration of error is meritorious for the reason announced from the bench during oral argument of the appeal — that is, the charge of the court during the sentencing phase of the trial was not sufficient to inform a reasonable juror that even though he might find a statutory aggravating circumstance to exist, he nonetheless might recommend life imprisonment.
Spivey v. State,
2. His second enumeration of error, relating to composition of the grand and traverse juries, is without merit because his challenge to the arrays was not timely filed.
Young v. State,
3. His enumeration of error based upon a contention that his trial counsel was ineffective because he failed to challenge the arrays of the grand and traverse juries likewise is without merit. Goodwin v. Hopper, supra; Francis v. Henderson, supra.
4. His enumeration of error complaining of the selection of a "death-prone jury” is without merit.
Davis v. State,
5. His enumeration of error based upon a Witherspoon excusal of a prospective juror is without merit as the transcript establishes that the juror’s opposition to capital punishment met the Witherspoon test as recently reiterated in Lockett v. Ohio, supra.
6. His enumeration of error contending that Bounds v. Smith,
7. His final enumeration of error is without merit. The Georgia capital-sentencing procedure and its
*246
provisions have been upheld as constitutional. Gregg v. Georgia,
Judgment affirmed as to the conviction; judgment vacated as to the sentence; and a new trial is ordered on the question of punishment.