Harris v. Deitrich
29 Mich. 366
Mich.
1874
Check Treatment
The Court

held, without passing upon the disputed questions of fact, that the taking a pro confesso on the same day the amended bill was filed, adding a new and material averment, without serving new process, was irregular, and that the application to open the decree and for a rehearing should have been granted.

Order reversed, with costs, and cause remanded for further proceedings.