History
  • No items yet
midpage
Harris v. Cotton
103 S.E. 89
Ga.
1920
Check Treatment
Eisii, C. J.

1. Even if the assignments of error in the motion for new trial, as to admitting evidence, are good in form with respect to sufficiently setting forth tfie evidence admitted over objection of the movant, they are without merit.

2. The verdict directed for the defendant in this case was demanded under the evidence, and it was not error to refuse a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Harris v. Cotton
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: May 11, 1920
Citation: 103 S.E. 89
Docket Number: No. 1579
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.