History
  • No items yet
midpage
Harris v. Commissioner
339 U.S. 917
SCOTUS
1950
Check Treatment

Certiorari granted limited to Questions “2” and “3” presented by the petition for the writ, i. e.:

“2. Were the transfers made by the petitioner to her husband under a property settlement agreement dated *918February 27, 1943, incidental to a Nevada divorce, made for an adequate and full consideration in money or money’s worth and thus not subject to gift tax?
Irwin N. Wilpon for petitioner. Solicitor General Perl-man, Assistant Attorney General Caudle, Ellis N. Slack, Lee A. Jackson and I. Henry Kutz for respondent.
“3. Were the transfers made by the petitioner to her husband in 1943, in payment and discharge of a legal obligation imposed by the judgment of the Nevada Court entered March 6, 1943, and thus not subject to gift tax?”

Case Details

Case Name: Harris v. Commissioner
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Mar 27, 1950
Citation: 339 U.S. 917
Docket Number: No. 596
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.