History
  • No items yet
midpage
Harlow v. City of Birmingham
296 So. 2d 206
Ala.
1974
Check Treatment

In re George HARLOW et al. v. The CITY OF BIRMINGHAM.

SC 730.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 9, 1974.

Rehearing Denied June 6, 1974.

296 So.2d 208

Ex parte George Harlow. Ex parte Thomas D. McGARY. Ex parte Michael ROBINSON.

Ferris S. Ritchey, Jr., Birmingham, Robert Eugene Smith, D. Freeman Hutton, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioners.

No brief for respondent.

BLOODWORTH, Justice.

Writ denied. (No opinion).

MERRILL, COLEMAN, HARWOOD, MADDOX, McCALL and FAULKNER, JJ., concur.

JONES, J., dissents.

HEFLIN, C. J., not sitting.

JONES, Justice (dissenting).

I would grant the writ. My views have been expressed in

McKinney v. City of Birmingham, 292 Ala. 726, 296 So.2d 236 (1974), released simultaneously with this opinion, and I respectfully dissent on the same grounds.

Case Details

Case Name: Harlow v. City of Birmingham
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: May 9, 1974
Citation: 296 So. 2d 206
Docket Number: SC 730
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.